All opinions are subject to modification
and technical correction prior to official publication in the North Carolina
Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports. In the event of
discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print
version appearing in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of
Appeals Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
NO. 606A04
FILED: 5 MAY 2005
TINYA CHERNEY
v.
NORTH
CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL PARK
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. §7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 603 S.E.2d 842 (2004), affirming a decision and order entered by the North Carolina Industrial Commission on 28 July 2003. Heard in the Supreme Court 19 April 2005.
Knott,
Clark & Berger, L.L.P., by Michael W. Clark, Kenneth R. Murphy, III, and
Joe Thomas Knott, for plaintiff-appellant.
Roy
Cooper, Attorney General, by William H. Borden, Special Deputy Attorney General,
for defendant-appellee.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the
decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
REVERSED.
Justice NEWBY did not participate in the consideration or
decision of this case.